| Careers in the US Foreign
Service The founder of GDI Solutions is a former member of the US
Foreign Service, as the Biography indicates (Bruce
Donnelly).
The American Foreign Service Association (AFSA) publishes an indepdendent
monthly magazine about foreign relations known as the Foreign Service
Journal (see http://www.afsa.org/fsj )
. This magazine may also be of interest to students or others with an
interest in pursuit of a Foreign Service career, in addition to official
government sites such as for the
US State Department
http://www.state.gov , which also publishes an in-house magazine called
"State" to which anyone with an interest in this field can easily subscribe
through the US Government Printing Office (GPO) at
http://bookstore.gpo.gov
US Foreign & Commercial Service
http://www.usatrade.gov/Website/website.nsf/WebBySubj/Main_Employment
The Agency for International Development (US AID)
The Foreign Agricultural Service (Dept. of Agriculture)
For information about Foreign Service careers, see the Recruitment
website of the U.S. State Department Board of Examiners :
www.careers.state.gov
There is a new website :
www.doscareers.com
and a March 24, 2004 deadline for applications.
There are also various
books about life in the Foreign Service,
including a new one from AFSA (
www.afsa.org ) about
work at a US Embassy.
In the past, the application materials for the Foreign Service Officer
exam have generally provided a very good bibliography of suggested books
about life in the Foreign service so that applicants will approach the
career with realistic expectations about some of the challenges, sacrifices,
and hardships involved by comparison to other types of government or private
sector jobs. That has included a recent "Story Project" initiative of
the Diplomatic Readiness Task Force to gather dozens of real-life
experiences among employees for reference by potential employees and their
families. Some of these stories can be found at the careers website
above.
Specialists
Recruitment for the US Foreign Service (as well as the Civil Service
side) has increased again in recent years, and there may be some
opportunities for mid-level entry (i.e., at higher ranks, given higher
experience) in some professional disciplines. For example, the State
Department typically needs talented General Services Officers and other
specialists to oversee their many facilities and other administrative needs
worldwide, including the work of the Foreign Buildings Office (designing,
building, and maintaining our diplomatic facilities worldwide, much as the
General Services Administration manages the needs for US buildings in the
federal government). If they ever actually undertake the significant
security improvements which have been discussed through endless studies for
more than 20 years in response to the risks posed by terrorism as well as
the changing needs of the Foreign Service, they will need professionals with
the talent to do the job well.
Speakers
Note that both AFSA and DACOR (Diplomatic and Consular Officers Retired -
www.dacor.org ) can be helpful sources of
speakers, such as retirees with long careers in the Foreign Service, about
the role of the US Foreign Service and various aspects of international
relations in practice, including expertise in specific regions of the world.
They seek to improve public understanding and support of the role of such
career Foreign Service professionals.
Another source of information for individuals with an interest in careers
in this field can be associations such as the Chicago Council on Foreign
Relations ( www.ccfr.org ), which
organizes many events on current topics, often including prominent foreign
officials as speakers. There are also such things as the Great
Decisions program, and the National Model UN conferences, and students may
want to be aware of the internship programs which exist at the State
Department and elsewhere in the government.
There are also the usual specialty publications, such as Foreign Affairs
and Foreign Policy magazine, but one should keep in mind that the needs of
the Foreign Service involve far more than political issues, particularly
because of a growing recognition of the importance of economic and
commercial roles, such as to support business, in the advancement of our
national interests. Those with more of an interest in the
international business side of government service should look into the
Foreign & Commercial Service of the US Department of Commerce. Those
who are concerned about helping Americans overseas, or administering our
immigration laws (which is far more than just a matter of homeland
security), should look into the work of the Consular Affairs office of the
State Department.
Academic
Incidentally, it is a myth to think that the path to the Foreign Service
is through a specialized academic program such as the School of Foreign
Service at Georgetown University, SAIS at Johns Hopkins, American
University, The Fletcher School at Tufts, the School of Government at
Harvard, leading international
business schools, or other prominent programs. There is no "right"
path to prepare for a successful Foreign Service career, because for many
years the Foreign Service has been expected to reflect the widest possible
diversity of backgrounds and cultural aspects within our society.
Foreign Service Officers come from a very diverse academic, economic,
geographic, and racial background. Entry is through a very objective
and challenging competitive examination process each year, and a very
well-rounded liberal arts education is probably far more important than the
specialization in political science, economics, or foreign affairs.
There is a special Foreign Service Institute (now part of the George P.
Schultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center) which provides very
specialized and high quality training for all members of the Foreign
Service, including an exceptional range of excellent, intensive language
training programs and cross-cultural or country training to prepare
employees for their work. In short, a Foreign Service career involves
a life-long commitment to continuing professional education in this
specialty, so don't assume that you need to learn everything before you
join. On the contrary, you will learn more on the job than any
university program could ever teach you in this specialty, so academic
programs prior to joining the Foreign Service need to provide the more
general background necessary to represent our country well. |
Observations about working
for, or with, the Foreign Service You might also want to look at the
latest pay schedule for the Foreign Service. In the past, junior
officers have typically started at Grades 5 or 6, step 1 and advance to
Grade 4, Step 1 or above within four years. A high percentage of these
junior officers will already have a Master's degree and several years of
significant work experience in the public or private sector.
You will find the pay schedule for 2003 at
http://www.afsa.org/2003pay.html
.
Note that members of the Senior Foreign Service (near or at Ambassador
rank, after a very long career) have a separate pay schedule, which is
capped by Congress at lower levels than executives or consultants of
comparable international experience. The current cap is $142,500 for
professionals who typically have 20 - 30 years of experience worldwide,
including very objective reporting and dealing with complex political and
economic challenges, risk analysis, and tough negotiations with top foreign
officials on vital issues).
Junior officer salaries aren't much better than school teachers, although
there are a few other benefits, such as housing (some furnished) while
working overseas. Of course, such benefits are not unusual for
corporate expatriate assignments, either. MBA's aren't likely to be
drawn by these salaries, so it is largely a myth in the Foreign Service that
they are still always competing for the best and the brightest just because
of the allure or image of the career.
Besides, the entry process takes a very long time, both for the exams and
the security clearances for those who pass. In the past, it was not
unusual for this to be a two year process for applicants from start to
finish, as contrasted to companies which can routinely take such decisions
and make offers quickly.
Anyway, the point is that one doesn't choose this career for the money,
especially given the personal security risks involved (not just terrorism),
and the family pressures of relocating unpredictably around the world every
few years to many places where other Americans would never want to live, or
even visit for a few days. It can be a fascinating career, offering a
chance to have a positive impact on the world in which we live, and to work
with some extremely talented and dedicated professionals, but those with an
interest in such a career should also realize that it can be an
extraordinarily frustrating and thankless job, too, like so many other
positions in government service.
For example, the Foreign Service is still struggling to make adequate
security improvements at embassies and consulates worldwide more than 20
years after the need became intuitively obvious to anyone. There have
been many studies and recommendations, but very limited progress, which is
why the plaque at the State Department (and a similar wall of honor at CIA)
listing the employees killed while working overseas keeps growing faster
than ever. Some of the studies have really been nothing more than a
way to create an illusion of concern and progress, while very little
actually happens.
A business would never tolerate such performance, as shown by the swift
response by many companies in the wake of 9/11/01 to the need to harden
corporate facilities against such security risks, including reconsideration
of where they locate their operations and control access to the area, as
well as improving their recovery procedures for disaster scenarios.
There is a great need for better management at State and the other
agencies in this regard, where there has long been a focus on political and
economic matters, but less attention paid to administrative issues.
Traditionally, they have not been good at recruiting good managers.
Instead, they recruit people who are sincerely dedicated to a career in
public service, and have many talents to offer, but rightly or wrongly,
administrative work and management skills are still not perceived as a way
to the top of the Foreign Service. The resistance to change is high,
so those who aspire to management work in the Foreign Service should go into
it with a realistic perception of the challenges and frustrations involved,
and the general lack of appreciation for such work.
The same applies to the Consular Affairs part of the State Department, as
well as other agencies, such as Commerce. There is a lot of talent,
but it is not always well managed or supported, partly because of the lack
of a strong domestic constituency for such work, or an understanding of the
importance of the work. For example, Consular work can be a
particularly thankless task, such as screening hordes of visa applicants to
administer our immigration laws (the importance of which is now a little
better understood), but it also involves very important work helping
Americans who are in trouble overseas.
Performance also becomes a persistent problem because top executives
ignore the desire and ability of State and Commerce officials to try to help
them (within the constraints of their roles), and instead propagate the idea
that government officials are simply useless or won't understand or respond
to their needs. There needs to be a much better dialogue between
international business executives and the State and Commerce officials about
how their roles can be complementary and work to mutual benefit. The
executives who blithely "write off" any government contacts as a waste of
their time simply add to the problem, instead of resolving it. This
wastes a valuable resource.
Look at it another way. These are the people who make up the global
knowledge management and contacts infrastructure which supports the
President and other top officials of the US government for policy decisions
and actions to support the full range of our national interests. If
you don't support and try to improve the effectiveness of their work, who
suffers?
It should be in the interest of all top executives with international
operations to better understand how these professionals can also support
their own needs.
Regardless of any general bias about the role of government or the impact
of other types of government services, Foreign Service Officers and other
specialists are on the front lines around the world in the defense of our
political, economic, security, and other interests. It makes sense to
learn more about how to work with them, and to make their efforts a little
less thankless by showing your appreciation and support when they are
helpful.
That goes for the Civil Service people who back them up here at home,
too, as well as the many dedicated Foreign Service National (local)
employees who do exceptional work on behalf of our embassies and consulates
around the world, sometimes at great personal risk. Unfortunately, for
example, the press accounts of terrorist attacks against our embassies and
consulates often neglect the tragic impact on local employees and visitors.
Attacks in recent years have typically killed more local employees than
Americans.
These local employees deserve far more recognition for their outstanding
work in support of our national interests. Their skills and contacts
are as indispensable as the local management of any multinational
corporation. Please respect and thank them for their good work.
They are a great asset. |